Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Samsung Gear 360 Real 360° High Resolution VR Camera (2016 version)

Samsung Gear 360 Real 360° High Resolution VR Camera

support page

360 photo album

my sample videos

I bought the older version because the image sensor has twice the pixels and uses them when taking pics to produce a 30 MP image which rivals anything I've seen so far under $700.

First issue was just getting it. I found one for just $72 but they kept extending the ship date. I finally just cancelled and ordered from a different seller for $20 more.

Next after getting it I found it would not work with my phone. I could swear that when I originally ordered it it said it worked with a Samsung Note 4 but after receiving it and finding it would not I went back and checked and only Note 5 and newer Samsungs were listed. To see if your phone is supported try installing the Samsung Gear 360 (New) app. But no worries there is a remote you can buy right?  The Aobelieve Bluetooth Remote Shutter for Samsung Gear 360 2016 and 2017 Edition Camera which works well. For remotely pushing the record button anyway which is the main thing. It was $3 off with 2 day shipping so I went ahead and got it even before I saw what kind of pics I was going to get.

While waiting on the remote I took a couple test shots to try out the software. Unfortunately like the Mokacam it appears you might not be able to get the software any more.  The site you download software for Samsung cameras from has been down for a week at this point of this writing. The camera outputs photos and video in the dual fisheye format like the Mokacam 360. I gather if you have one of the few models this and the newer model cam are supposed to work with the phone converts (stitches) it to the postable standard equirectangular projection format the newer / better cams output.  Googling I did not find a lot of options either. AutoPano has closed its doors so you can not even buy it though the site is still up. I looked on Alternatives. I tried a few but unfortunately most seem to want separate files they can stitch into a panorama, not a 360 sphere. PTGui is suppose to convert the dual fisheye directly. I downloaded the trial and tried several options but none came out right. Finally found a way to convert the photos at least. A free online service called Though the seams are pretty obvious, if the angle is right you might hide them. See 360 photo album. So I still need a better solution or the camera is one step away from useless. In several places Samsung refers to the software as CyberLink ActionDirector so I went to CyberLink. There it shows ActionDirector is for video and PhotoDirector is for photos so I downloaded a trial of that from them. (After having to create a new account before I could run the software because they seem to think my password changed at some point since 2011.)  But again that does not seem to work with 360 files. So back I went for ActionDirector which seems to require an account to even download the trial. While it appears it is not the same as the Samsung version it does appear to be using it as a base. This video shows how you are supposed to use the Samsung version to convert / stitch the videos but the CyberLink version says the files are corrupt and will not even open them. This post shows how ActionDirector should also convert / stitch your photos as well but the CyberLink version just imports them as is. What it does seem to do is let you view them as 360 pics but with worse stitching than the option. Compare the screengrab here.
With the stitched version on Flikr. And this still does not get you to something postable.

I was about to just give up on this when I stumbled upon a post from 2010 in a CNet forum that says the hostname has changed to  This camera came out out in 2016 they were using the wrong host name for download links a good 6 years after it changed and they are still wrong today! This is the link to download the Samsung ActionDirector software.

So I got the Samsung software installed. Note it is so close the the stock Cyberlink version that you have to close the Cyberlink version to install it.  After registering it hung trying to import sample media. Restarting again I selected a new 360 VR Video project

That let me import the pics but only if I have not edited them in Photoshop. As you can see here the 2 I increased the contrast on failed to convert on import though did. It is not obvious but ActionDirector converts on import and sticks them in the export directory. You need to right click on the files to open the folder to see them if you are not sure where that folder is.
On the plus side the ones it converted do look better than when converted with And I was able to convert some sample videos. Though the videos are not great. Full screen even on a 27 inch monitor they pretty pixelated. Especially when the cam is moving. But then like I said at the start I was mainly interested in the 30 MP photos since I was already disappointed in the video Kodak PIXPRO SP360 4K Dual Pro Pack VR Camera which was about twice the vertical and horizontal resolution of the Samsung. You will notice they both suffer from a shallow depth of field and focus fixed about 10 feet from the lens. The photo resolution and quality are pretty much the same though.  The Kodak was $850 when I bought (and then returned) it back in 2016. It is going the $350 now. Which is what the Samsung was going for back in 2016.

I added some sunset and indoor sample pics to my Samsung Gear 360 album

Editing is non standard. To edit the pics read Now you can edit 360 photos in Photoshop … here's how

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Moving a domain

Updated from these instructions.  Why moving from GoDaddy to Google? See price comparison.

Go to the Godaddy domain manager.

Find the domain to move and when you hover over it the check in the lock column becomes and edit link
Set the lock to off

Click on the domain name and remove privacy. Note before removing check that the email is valid and working.
Scroll to the bottom and click on Transfer domain away from GoDaddy

Scroll to the bottom again and fill out form. Note the most popular options are oddly not in the drop down choices of where you are going to.

Click Continue with transfer and you get this last screen

This may take awhile. You should get an email when done.

Note too GoDaddy seems to give you a blank screen when you try and go back to the domain list to do the next one. You might need to go back to products page then select Manage button on the next domain to transfer the next one.

Once you get that email, go to Google domains and start transfer

That gets you to a page to enter the code GoDaddy emailed you.

Enter the code and click continue and you get this

You probably want to use their nameservers. Click continue And they will confirm you want privacy ans tell you the price.
Note your $12 on Goggle includes privacy unlike GoDaddy where a .biz is $21 for the domain PLUS $10 for privacy.
Pay on the next screen. Then back to the transfer page where this domain has been added to list looking like this.
Note that is says it could be a week before it is truly final and may require a confirmation to and email so keep an eye on it.

Once the process is done it is a good idea to double check your DNS entries to make sure nothing got lost or changed along the way.

Here is a quick compare of the costs for my domains. Note where TLD not available price is shown as $9999
Obviously registering them on the cheapest for each could save you some and Namecheap's average cost (3rd from bottom) and total cost (2nd from bottom) is a bit cheaper than Google but given the yearly diff is less than $20 and I like Google's management tools better it seems worth it just to have everything in together at Google.

Monday, October 22, 2018

Mokacam 360

I've added a Youtube playlist of my 360 cam videos

Draft 5/14/2018

Well my Mokacam 360 FINALLY showed up over a year after the scheduled ship date. Still waiting for the accessory kit as of 5/14/2018. It also appears to be a Vivitar DVR988-BLK 360 Action Camera, which is getting equally bad reviews. with a metal plate front and back to cover it. Maybe to hid the name? The Vivitar is the same price and also claims to be high rez but only does video at 960p. This pic gives you an idea of the quality. Note stills are 3008 by 1504.

You even have to convert the video and pictures so anything sees them as 360 after getting them off the camera. Note you still need 360 support to view them as 360 so this does not appear as 360 here.
I'll use at the next show but probably not going to be worth the bother after that. Might be worth using for valley shots if the remote ever gets here. (See update below for how bad that went.)

The Mokacam 360 is a disappointment on many levels.
First off it was over a year late shipping.
When it did get here the app did not work at all. Fortunately the Vivitar app does though it seems to lose connection a lot even a couple feet from the camera.
The video is really poor but then it is only doing 960 X 960 on each lens despite it obviously having 1504 x 1504 sensors. I can only imagine for image stabilization though there is not mention of this. But it you think about it there really is not much you can do with that low of resolution.
This is a nice explanation of relative resolutions Now think about your average cheap 720p (1280x720) security cam that has a horizontal viewing angle of around 70 degrees and you still can not really make out anything of any distance on them. They are OK on a small screen and for seeing things close, like a Ring Doorbell for instance. That is 1280 pixels over 70 degrees or about 18 pixels per degree. This is 960 pixels over more than 180 degrees so you are talking 4 to 5 pixels per degree. So just to match the video quality of that cheap 720p camera you really need 3240 x 3240 pixels. 4K will get you there on the horizontal but not the vertical. And that is just one side. You really need about 12K video to pull off the same level of quality in full 360 x 360 you would get from 720p.

Note on their Indiegogo page they claim 30fps@2K and infer that is the same as the Samsung Gear 360 but it is not. Note too the Samsung Gear 360 (2017 Edition) Real 360° 4K VR Camera (US Version with Warranty)  has an MSRP of $229, is going for $89 with one day free shipping (on 10/22/2018) and the price seems to be on a downward trend. The reported record resolution for the Samsung is 4096x2048 @ 24fps 360° Video/15MP 360° pictures. Just goes to show how shipping late blows your market. There is also the GoPro Fusion — 360 Waterproof Digital VR Camera with Spherical 5.2K HD Video 18MP Photos which sounds like it is a bit better but at $600 it might not be worth it. You also might want to look at this page for other options.

Update 10/22/2018

I did get my accessory pack a week or so later and managed to get a quick test video done on the 3rd try that was stitched correctly but then forgot how I did it when I had some show footage to try it on. (See further on.)  So I left this post on hold. I used the Mokacam 360 again at a show a couple weeks ago and thought I'd take another shot at it.

I was making another go at it today and decided to go looking to see if any updates or advice had been posted. I ended up posting my frustration (see below) the projects Indiegogo page. Where it seems they are still failing to fulfill orders:
The post: Anyone ever got this thing to record in higher than 1920 by 960? Or found any settings other that record mode? Checked site for new firmware but there appears to be apps, firmware and manual for only one of their 4 models and this cam is not it. Only other thing on support page is “Forum under maintenance”. Website is so painfully slow it appears to be on the verge of crashing. Of the 2 Mokacam apps in the Google store only one sees the camera and it says it is the wrong one for the camera.

Still searching around in frustration I stumbled upon the Mokacam 360 Windows app I must have downloaded at some point (which appears to no longer be available anywhere and is probably why I was getting nowhere). If I view the video and pics in that app they look OK. This made think about a comment I made above in May about needing to convert the video, despite the Indiegogo page saying this is done in camera with no post processing needed. Sort of hidden in this no longer available player app is the needed converter. The icon is a pair of scissors cutting film down in the lower left. When you click on that you get this.

Click on these links to see the raw and converted videos these pics were taken from.

The above raw file looks like this in Windows Movie & TV player

In Mokacam 360 player in the default mode (Saturn like icon) it looks like this.
Not real useful but some people seem to like it.

In 360 mode you get this.
Funny the stitching is best at a distance yet the lot many of these cameras the best focus is within a few feet.

In world view it starts out looking like this
But you can zoom in world view (unlike 360 view). At max zoom it looks like this.

After converting the video it looks even more zoomed like this in Windows Movie & TV app even though zoom no longer works.
Note this added zoom also tends to make the video look more blurry and pixelated.

Now for a real test

Doing the conversion takes about as long as playing the file even on my heavy duty workstation and the output is dubious. There appears to be a merge option but the camera drops frames. As in a full one to two seconds lost between clips. So you will want to do them one at a time. Manually as there seems to be no batch convert mode. Note even my Canon G30 drops the occasional frame but this is up there with my junky Crosstour 4K Go Pro clone.

Here is a shot of my timeline with screen grabs (in violet) filling the missing frames between two clips of a "continuous record".

Click on these links to see the raw and converted videos the below pics were taken from.
To compare with the Kodak PIXPRO SP360 4K Dual Pro Pack VR Camera see my samples from that camera in this playlist.

In the Mokacam 360 player app this unconverted concert video looks like this
Note the lack of a gap that appears in the next picture

Here is a shot of that raw file in flat mode in Windows Movie & TV player

Even in 360 / VR mode unconverted it looks like this with that monster gap
The above is not that clear (low light is iffy to start with) but here is a shot from the same video after processing in flat mode
Basically it stretches out the circles to fill the frame so the less than 960 x 960 pixel circular is down rezed even more.  Now when viewed in 360 / VR mode it looks REAL low rez.

Lastly for comparison here is a screen grab of the final rendered video
See what I mean about the added zoom making thing worse?

If you want to edit this in Premiere CC Pro here is how.

I suggest you make a multicam to sync the video with decent audio. I say this because the cam drops frames. Though if you are not going to need to sync multiple sources you can skip this. Otherwise
select the audio track first. (If audio is more than one file make a sequence from the parts first then use that as the audio.) Create multicam sequence by selecting sync on audio, then all the video clips, right click and select create multicam.
Note your Sequence Preset should be custom 1920x960 @ 30 fps for the Mokacam 360

Based on Support for VR Workflows

VR sync as above then
Select clips
Clip->Modify->Audio Channels (Shift+G)

Goto Interpret Footage tab and set options like this

Same with Sequence -> Sequence Settings

To rotate the picture to where the front of the camera was pointing add the VR Projection effect to your clips and pan -90 degrees

Make other adjustments as needed to center and align default view on subject.

Export settings should be like

Again this final rendering is very slow. The 11 minute video above took about 8 hours to render.

How about pictures

As stated above pictures are 3008 by 1504 which is between 2K and 4K.  Pictures seem to require that conversion step as well. Here is a raw picture

And the converted picture.

You will notice neither seems to be viewing as a 360 picture. For that you have to upload the converted picture to a site like Flikr. Click here to see the converted and the raw pictures on Flikr.

What is after Facebook?

From 7/18/2018

The way it seems most think the main reason most are on Facebook is everyone is on Facebook. Once something "better" gains some market share people will just shift their time there.Not remove their accounts just stop checking and updating them. Just like when people "moved" from MySpace to Facebook. That just has just been the way of the internet.

It is not a question if Facebook will go away. Yahoo Groups is still around for example and that was way pre MySpace. For that matter Match is still around after being sold to almost everyone at some point and that goes back to before the internet to the BBS days. Once you get to a certain point it seems like there is always funding to keep going.

The questions are, where will be the next place the most people spend most of their time and when will it be recognized as THE place to be?

LiveJournal was getting traction for a bit there but the whole being Russian based thing kind of killed that.

Currently I'm hearing of people going to MeWe though so far it seems to have less users than Google Plus. MeWe is basically just Facebook profiles, messenger and groups without ads. They hope to get you pay for upgrades over the free services to pay the bills. Seems to be just people and groups. No fan pages means no companies though and that might be their down fall since people seem to like that they are often heard by companies when complaining about them on Twitter or Facebook. Not to mention that kind of leaves out artists too. Though I guess you could sort get around that with a group based on the artist(s). Also it does not seem have an API or to work with anything yet. So for instance if you post to Twitter you can't get it to post to your MeWe account too. That is what mainly kept Google Plus from taking off so again it might be deal breaker for many. But then there is no real reason they can not add these features if enough ask for them.

My personal feeling is it is almost impossible for anyone starting out to compete with Facebook at their level of features but people are getting REAL fed up too so things will probably fragment for awhile. Using one site for this and another for that. For instance, getting family and groups to move to MeWe or similar leaving Facebook increasingly more just companies and artists kind of like what happened to MySpace. Then at some point some one will start adding features to head back to doing what Facebook does. For the most part. I'm guessing with freemium business model similar to MeWe's as that seems to be the industry trend now.

I'm actually kind of amazed has not jumped in here yet. Selling you stuff is getting to be less and less of their business They run the cloud for a good chunk of the internet already and they have already seen the future in streaming. While most content providers are increasing pulling their content to exclusive sites Amazon started partnering with them to give users one place to view, search and pay for them all. Not to mention their push into automation. Note MeWe is hosted in the AWS cloud.

Update 10/22/2018

Not much has changed other than Google announcing it is giving up on Google + and Facebook stopped letting IFTTT post account status updates. You can still post to pages for now at least. (Note only one page per IFTTT account. To post to multiple Facebook pages requires multiple IFTTT accounts.) The overall feel now though is that Facebook will end up being your only real choice and it will probably lose features you use now and gain some you do not want like the Portal which seems to confirm the rumors about Facebook that worry the most people. That it is trying to monitor you 24/7. Not just track your web usage but listen to your conversations and with the Portal even literally watch you.

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

My backup / NAS evolution

First I started syncing up some stuff to the cloud and other stuff to USB drives. But that did not protect from much other than drive failure.

So I added Carbonite which kept getting messed up causing me to start the upload to the cloud over from scratch. It was also uploading so slow that it never seemed to finish. At the time it did not support USB drives or network mounted drives. The only real plus was it linked straight into Windows Explorer making it easy to select and unselect what got uploaded to the cloud.

So I did a bit more research added Crashplan Home which let me back up stuff from several Windows and Linux servers to a 16 TB Linux box in the shop and the cloud. Technically I could back up everything to the cloud but only did a subset given the time involved. It did not care if the data was local or not and was a lot faster uploading to the cloud than Carbonite was.

At about this point I had 2 of the 4 4 TB drives on my main workstation with 8 TB drives and was having to move stuff around to make space so a RAID seemed to make sense. After a bit of research I decided on the Drobo 5n which supported putting all sizes of drives (which I had loads of laying about). Another selling point was it said it ran Crashplan native although this turned out to no longer be true when I bought it. I went with the n (NAS) version instead of the USB version thinking this would give me more options. Given that Crashplan supported backing up a network mapped drive this seemed to work fine for awhile.

Then the year of adventure started. 2017 saw a lot of services start cutting features, support and or jacking prices. While already dealing with site hosting changes Google Drive where I had about 1.5 TB of stuff uploaded (technically it was more like 3 to 4 TB but Google does not count most of it) decided when my free 1 TB offer ran out (which gave me 2 TB not the 1 TB I already had free for a year) they would not let me pay for it. My options were remove stuff down to, a counted, 1 TB of data or pay for 10 TB (at 10 times the price). So I started moving stuff to Amazon Drive. which was half the price of Google Drive for unlimited space. Downside was the Amazon Drive interface is REALLY bad. Plus sharing is limited and it does not seem to support versioning like Google Drive does. Odrive helps make it usable but has its own costs.

Then Amazon decided they were they dropping from unlimited to 1 TB for the $60/yr price. Then Crashplan announced it was dropping their Home plan meaning you had to start paying per computer and only supporting backing up network mapped drives if you paid by the TB. (This is where getting the Drobo 5n over the 5c, USB version came back to haunt me.) At a minimum this was going to increase my cost 5 fold. While updating my backup research I started having connection issues with the Linux server I was backing up to and the Drobo was running out of space.

Drobo fun starts

So I babied the Linux server Crashplan connection to the PC doing the Drobo backup for several days. (Remember it turned out Crashplan did not actually run on the 5n model.) I finally got the drive backed up to the Linux box so I had a full backup. Then I swapped out the smallest drive, a 2 TB, for an 8 TB and waited for the rebuild to finish. But it seems I should have checked the logs first because one of the 4 TB drives had dropped offline a couple times and if did it again during the rebuild which corrupted the whole Drobo. I should note here though not actually an issue the Drobo had been telling my I needed to update the software even though the software was already at the version it was telling me to upgrade to. Anyway now I'm panicking since a good bit of the data is is raw video from concerts that is only on the Drobo and the Linux backup and the Drobo is now toast AND the Linux box is getting iffy. So I ordered a Synology 12 bay NAS DiskStation DS2415+ (Diskless)  plus 4 8 TB drives.

Adding Synology (SHR vs SHR-2)

The main difference between SHR and SHR-2 is the SHR-2 allows 2 drives to die at the same time and still be able to recover versus only one with SHR. The plan is to run it in SHR-2 mode so I can use unmatched size drives and handle 2 drives failing at the same time. This way I can start with the 4 8TBs and then move over the 4 4 TB drives from the Linux server. From what I had read this seemed doable.

Turns out it is not.  While SHR lets you add anything,  SHR-2 only lets you add drives to a volume (RAID) larger than the smallest already in the volume. Plus adding a drive larger than the smallest is treated like the smallest drive in the volume. (Note according to what I'm reading if you add 2 of the larger drives it will start to use all of the drives again. The calculator seems to say you need 4.) So for instance if you have a 4 TB and 3 8 TBs you get the same space as 4 4 TBs. With SHR that gets you 20 TB of space after overhead but only 8 TB with SHR-2.

Swapping that 4 out with an 8 TB gets you 24 TB with SHR and 16 TB with SHR-2. The confusing bit is the Synology online calculator shows if you start with those 4 8s and add a 4 TB you get 28 and 20 TB but you can't actually do that with SHR-2.
What you can do is start with a 4 TB and 4 8s and you still get 28 TB in SHR but only 16 TB with SHR-2.

Oddly the Drobo calculator appears to split the difference. Presumably they are miss reporting "reserved" space as protection space since Protections space is larger than available.

A quick note on price

For a 5 bay NAS the Drobos will run you a bit less $400-$500 than the one model 5 bay NAS Synology at $790 though there are 2 and 4 bay Synology version that as a bit cheaper. However for around $800 you can get an 8 bay NAS from either and for $1333 you can get a 12 bay Synology. What you get on top of the extra bays is extra Ethernet ports (2 with the 8 bay and 4 with the 12 bay) allowing the NAS to talk to multiple networks and or aggregate ports to get higher throughput so it can handle more things talking to it at a once.

The interfaces

Drobo makes you install an app on a PC to configure and otherwise control your Drobos. And it is pretty simple. As noted about above it was having issues with the 3.15 version not seeing it had been updated.

Synology on the other hand you access via a built in web server that looks like GUI desktop.

It should be noted too from Windows explorer Drobo shows you the theoretical max size volume NOT the actual size and available space of the volume. Synology shows you correct info.
Of course shares are basically folders in a volume so each share shows the space reported for the volume.

The new backup design

After checking out a lot of options I was about to buy a Drobo 5c so I could go with Backblaze without having to pay per TB when someone told me how they had unlimited space on Google Drive. Seems if you have a business account with Google (aka G Suite), which costs the same per month per user as 1 TB of Google Drive space, you get 1 TB of Google Drive space per user (shared between users till you have 5 users, at which point it goes unlimited). So now I can buy as many TBs as I want, no 1 to 10 TB jump AND if even if I get as high as 20 TB it will cost half the 10 TB Google Drive cost. Plus you get more features like shared private drive separate from users private drive space where they can share with outside users. Plus Synology as an app called Cloud Sync which lets you sync your cloud services with the NAS. So now it makes sense to move everything to Google. Note for some odd reason when linking Cloud Sync to a Google Drive account you need to use a browser OTHER THAN Chrome. This is a known bug.
You can also link multiple Google accounts allowing you sync to the the various drive spaces of your G Suite users. You can also encrypt the data uploaded to Google if you are worried about someone getting a hold of it. Coupling this with Odrive lets me do something as wild as syncing triggered snaps from the security camera servers to Google Drive via Odrive while automatically removing them locally after a day to make viewing the triggered snaps easier and reduce used space. On the Synology side you can tell it to sync all but the camera snaps.

Update: some Google Drive gotchas

First to move files between accounts is going to take some work. Some oddness I found was:

  • If you have a folder owned by account A and shared with B, B can "make a copy" of that folder but B does not own any files in the resulting folder. However if B uploads to that folder they do own that new file and that new file is shared with the everyone the original folder was shared with. 
  • You can not change the owner of the files or folders to your new account unless they both use an email address in the same domain which would seem impossible if you are moving from end user account to business account since the business account requires a domain owned by you while the end user accounts are gmail based.
  • Moving the files from the folder owned by A to one owned by B does NOT change their owner either even though it warns you that the files will no longer be available to the people they were shared with and it actually seems to be copying the files, not moving them, as in it takes a while to move them. You will also need to reshare all the folders and files if you want the same people to see them again like they were in user A's folders.
  • After doing the above I found video files in User A's Google Photos folder though somewhat hidden since clicking on that folder in the web interface (without Photo app open) takes you to the Photos app where videos do not show. Using left nav you can get to the Photos sub folders and see the files. However these seem to be raw video files that should not even be there.
  • If you remove the above video files from the Photo folders you get pop ups telling you people are loosing access and they are in the trash but when you look at the Trash folder online they are not there.
  • Even after all the above the files still count against user A's storage total even though they are only visible from user B's account. You will need to remove them from users B's folders too before user A gets anymore space made available.
  • So the only way that works to move files between end user and business accounts seems to be to download them local and then upload them again as user B. This is in fact what Google support tells you despite most of the other methods above were posted by people as workarounds. Kind of insane way to move TBs of files between folders on Google servers. And can take forever depending on your upload speed. Over 3 months to upload 1 TB over a 1Mb/s upload connection. Fortunately I have 20 Mbp/s so it should only take about a month.
Note if you are thinking, like I was, you could avoid having to reshare everything by just having B upload the downloaded files to user B's "copy" of the original folder that does not seem to work either because when you upload the file it appears to act as a restore reassigning the owner to user A. You need to start with a new folder owned by B and have B upload to it then reshare all the folders A originally had them shared to. A major pain.